» Photo Album » Aetolian Miscellaneous » Um, Tsol'aa Syssin...yeah...

Um, Tsol'aa Syssin...yeah...

» Comments

Author	Message
Jahara Family Friend Joined: 01 Jul 2005	Posted: 12 Oct 2005 22:52     Subject: What Arynn said....
Top	View profile
Sarkis Council Member Joined: 13 Apr 2005	Posted: 13 Oct 2005 02:26     Subject: *drool* *Cough*
Top	View profile
Avian Council Member Joined: 12 Dec 2004	Posted: 13 Oct 2005 02:42     Subject: ...God my eyes... I thought I saw enough playing water polo. Apparently not.
Top	View profile
Jahara Family Friend Joined: 01 Jul 2005	Posted: 13 Oct 2005 03:26     Subject: ....and now i'm curious about water polo. ...y'know, when I was little I used to think water polo was just like regular polo, only the horses ran around in really shallow water. Heh.
Top	View profile
Sarkis Council Member Joined: 13 Apr 2005	Posted: 13 Oct 2005 03:52     Subject: *tickle Jaha* I don't pay attention to Water polo, really. Rugby...ther eis a nasty, dirty, underhanded sport.
Top	View profile
Hatake Council Member Joined: 30 Jan 2005	Posted: 13 Oct 2005 06:40     Subject: Well done very nice drawing. But it has one huge error. Look at the arrow there's not even a broadhead on it. Really this guy shooting arrows only of wood?? Without a head on it -cackle- what a lame hunter. But that's just a detail. Not that I like naked man. Not at all. But the drawing is very well done.
Top	View profile
Jahara Family Friend Joined: 01 Jul 2005	Posted: 14 Oct 2005 00:08     Subject: Ooooh...Rugby is fun! Not to play but to watch. My family holds a match at every reunion, keeps us from beating the hell out of each other on any other occasions. I.e. Funerals. ...oi
Top	View profile
Avian Council Member Joined: 12 Dec 2004	Posted: 14 Oct 2005 02:07     Subject: In water polo, you have a bunch of guys in Speedos. Seven people per team, including one goalie. You have a pool twenty-five  meters long. Two goals. Tada. There are a lot more rules. You can look 'em up. The only rule to remember in water polo, though, is not to get caught. Leads to some vicious things.
Top	View profile
Arota Council Member Joined: 11 May 2005	Posted: 14 Oct 2005 17:24     Subject: Mmm, I'd say thanks for the comment Hata, but it's not mine I WISH it was, but I absolutely suck at doing anything in colour.  It's one of those weird things about me...I'm very artistic, in lots of different ways...but just TRY to get me to do a decent colour picture by hand - it's impossible, trust me.  Several different teachers have tried. But as for the arrow...that is the style of a modern arrow.  I assume the artist just didn't know the difference, or that the modern, sleek arrow fit better.
Top	View profile
Hatake Council Member Joined: 30 Jan 2005	Posted: 14 Oct 2005 20:05     Subject: The drawing can't be that old. You can see the brooch on his clothes and the bracers. If they are so skilled to make that then they surely use a head on the arrow. And another thing to just point out for those who didn't figure it out yet. This is a naked Legolas. -points at the brooch- see But that is besides the point. It's a big error of the person who did this. If they are so advanced to make such nice bracers then they already have figured out centuries ago to put a head on an arrow. As I said the drawing is nice but such an error decreases the quality of a drawing greatly.
Top	View profile
Pag 2 of 3 Previous   1 2 3   Next

» Image properties